Organizing and Analyzing Pilot Study Data in Research: A Practical Guide Using Excel

 

Organizing and Analyzing Pilot Study Data in Nursing and Community Research: A Practical Guide Using Excel

By Prof.Midhu Kurian

Senior Writer, Healthcare Digital

Arranging and analyzing data collected during a pilot study is a critical step in ensuring the research is systematic and the results are meaningful. Below, I’ll guide you through how to organize data in an Excel sheet and analyze it statistically for common research tools (surveys, questionnaires, and rating scales) used in your nursing and community-focused study. I’ll also provide examples tailored to these tools and study designs.

---

Step 1: Arranging Data in Excel

Excel is a versatile tool for organizing pilot study data. The key is to structure the data in a way that facilitates analysis.

General Structure

• Rows: Each row represents an individual participant or response.
• Columns: Each column represents a variable (e.g., demographic details, survey questions, or rating scale items).
• First Row: Use this as a header row with clear, concise labels for each variable (e.g., "Participant_ID", "Age", "Q1_Response", "Rating_Scale_Score").

Example Setup for Nursing/Community Research

Participant_ID	Age	Gender	Q1_Satisfaction (Survey)	Q2_Frequency (Questionnaire)	Rating_Scale_Health (1-5)
001	34	M	Yes	Often	4
002	45	F	No	Rarely	2
003	28	F	Yes	Sometimes	3

• Participant_ID: Unique identifier for each respondent.
• Demographics: Age, Gender, etc., to analyze trends across groups.
• Q1_Satisfaction: A survey question (e.g., "Are you satisfied with community nursing services?").
• Q2_Frequency: A questionnaire item (e.g., "How often do you visit a community nurse?").
• Rating_Scale_Health: A Likert scale (e.g., 1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent) on perceived health.

Tips for Data Entry

1. Consistency: Use the same format (e.g., "M" for Male, "F" for Female; numerical values for rating scales).
2. Coding: Convert qualitative responses to numbers where possible (e.g., Yes = 1, No = 0; Often = 3, Sometimes = 2, Rarely = 1).
3. Missing Data: Leave cells blank or use a specific code (e.g., "NA") for missing responses.

---

Step 2: Analyzing Data with Statistics

The statistical analysis depends on the study design (e.g., descriptive, correlational, experimental) and the type of data collected (nominal, ordinal, interval/ratio). Below are common tools and methods for your nursing/community research focus.

1. Surveys

• Purpose: To gather opinions or experiences (e.g., satisfaction with nursing care).
• Data Type: Often nominal (Yes/No) or ordinal (e.g., Agree/Disagree).
• Analysis:
  • Descriptive Statistics: Calculate frequencies and percentages.
    • Excel: Use COUNTIF or Pivot Tables.
    • Example: "70% of respondents (21/30) are satisfied with nursing services."
  • Chi-Square Test: To check if satisfaction differs by gender.
    • Excel: Use CHISQ.TEST or manual calculation.
    • Example: "Is satisfaction with nursing care independent of gender? (p = 0.04, significant)."

2. Questionnaires

• Purpose: To measure behaviors or frequencies (e.g., "How often do you access community health services?").
• Data Type: Ordinal (e.g., Rarely, Sometimes, Often) or nominal.
• Analysis:
  • Frequencies: Summarize responses.
    • Excel: Pivot Table to count "Often" vs. "Rarely."
    • Example: "50% of participants visit a nurse 'Sometimes,' 30% 'Rarely.'"
  • Mann-Whitney U Test: Compare responses between two groups (e.g., urban vs. rural).
    • Excel: Requires add-ins (e.g., Real Statistics) or manual calculation.
    • Example: "Urban residents visit nurses more often than rural (p = 0.03)."

3. Rating Scales

• Purpose: To assess perceptions or attitudes (e.g., "Rate your health from 1-5").
• Data Type: Ordinal (e.g., Likert scale: 1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent).
• Analysis:
  • Mean/Median: Summarize central tendency.
    • Excel: Use AVERAGE for mean, MEDIAN for median.
    • Example: "Average health rating is 3.2 (SD = 0.8)."
  • T-Test or ANOVA: Compare means across groups (e.g., male vs. female ratings).
    • Excel: Use T.TEST or Data Analysis Toolpak for ANOVA.
    • Example: "Health ratings differ significantly between age groups (F = 4.5, p = 0.02)."

---

Step 3: Matching Analysis to Study Design

Here’s how to align statistical methods with common study designs in nursing/community research:

Descriptive Study

• Goal: Describe characteristics (e.g., satisfaction levels in a community).
• Tools: Surveys, questionnaires.
• Analysis: Frequencies, percentages, means, medians.
• Example: "60% of nurses report high workload; median satisfaction score is 3."

Correlational Study

• Goal: Explore relationships (e.g., health rating vs. frequency of nurse visits).
• Tools: Rating scales, questionnaires.
• Analysis: Spearman’s Rank Correlation (ordinal data) or Pearson Correlation (interval data).
• Excel: Use CORREL for Pearson; add-ins for Spearman.
• Example: "Higher nurse visit frequency correlates with better health ratings (r = 0.65, p < 0.01)."

Experimental Study

• Goal: Test an intervention (e.g., effect of a new nursing program on satisfaction).
• Tools: Pre/post surveys, rating scales.
• Analysis: Paired T-Test (pre/post) or Independent T-Test (control vs. intervention group).
• Excel: Use T.TEST.
• Example: "Satisfaction increased post-intervention (t = 2.8, p = 0.01)."

---

Practical Example in Nursing/Community Context

Scenario: Pilot study on community perceptions of nursing services.

• Tools:
  • Survey: "Are you satisfied with nursing care? (Yes/No)"
  • Questionnaire: "How often do you see a nurse? (Rarely/Sometimes/Often)"
  • Rating Scale: "Rate nursing quality (1-5)."
• Excel Data:

  ID	Satisfied	Frequency	Quality_Rating
  001	Yes	Often	4
  002	No	Rarely	2

• Analysis:
  • Survey: 60% said "Yes" (Pivot Table).
  • Questionnaire: Median frequency = "Sometimes" (coded as 2).
  • Rating Scale: Mean quality = 3.5 (AVERAGE); compare genders with T-Test.

---

Additional Tips

1. Pilot Study Focus: Use simple stats (frequencies, means) to test feasibility; refine tools based on results.
2. Software: Excel works for small datasets; for larger studies, consider SPSS or R.
3. Validation: Check data entry accuracy (e.g., spot-check 10% of entries).